Project Untangled
CLOSE MENU

Follow us on social media

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Youtube
Project Untangled


    Categories
    Uncategorized

    UNTANGLED RESEARCHERS PRESENT THEIR FINDINGS IN GRONINGEN

    The interdisciplinary event brought together researchers in economics, economic geography, sociology, organizational psychology, management science and technology, and innovation science. The speakers presented complementary perspectives on the consequences of automation technologies. Piotr Lewandowski presented the paper “Automation and Income Inequality in Europe”, co-authored with Karina Doorley (ESRI), Jan Gromadzki (IBS), Philippe van Kerm (LISER), and Dora Tuda (ESRI).

     

    Their preliminary findings suggest that between 2006 and 2018, the adoption of robots significantly reduced wages and employment in Europe. Although automation widened wage inequality, it had a minimal impact on household income inequality. Finally, they found that risk sharing in households and redistribution cushion the effect of automation.

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES CONTRIBUTE TO WIDER WAGE INEQUALITIES, STUDY FINDS

     

    In the research paper “The digital service economy as a source of intraregional wage inequalities” Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi and Elisa Panzera analyse how three models of the digital service economy – the product-service economy, sharing economy and online service model – affect wage disparities within European regions.

     

     

    Each of these models has specific characteristics. The product-service economy entails a strategy wherebymanufacturers offer their customers not only products but also various services, such as training or consultancy. Meanwhile, the sharing economy is based on the creation of new online markets for underutilised assets (e.g. a spare seat in a car, a spare bedroom, spare time) which are made temporarily accessible to other users upon payment based on a peer-to-peer exchange (BlaBlaCar, TaskRabbit, Airbnb). Finally, the online service economy involves digital platforms providing services, products or content (e.g. mobility solutions, food delivery services, payment) without owning the necessary assets. This value creation model rests on the dematerialisation of assets or products, enabled by the unbundling of products from the service a product can provide (Deliveroo, Uber).

     

    “Popular fears that the diffusion of the new technologies will increase inequalities are not fully misplaced. However, regions are not similarly exposed to these risks, and only some of them are experiencing a widening of wage inequality conditions,” says Roberta Capello, professor at the Politecnico Di Milano.

     

    She and her co-authors analysed data on innovations and wages from 164 regions between 2009 and 2016 and found that a noticeable widening of wage inequalities took place in regions where digital service economy models were fully developed and co-occurred. When only one model prevailed, its impact on wage disparities was limited.

     

    “Our findings suggest that in regions with a fully developed digital service economy pattern, or in those where sharing economy is dominant, policymakers should focus on interventions,” says Camilla Lenzi.

     

    Capello, R., Lenzi, C., & Panzera, E. (2023). “The digital service economy as a source of intraregional wage inequalities” (Deliverable 4.7). Leuven: UNTANGLED project 1001004776 – H2020.

     

    The paper is available here.

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    UNTANGLED CAFÉ BRINGS TOGETHER 12 LABOUR MARKET EXPERTS

    The February 14 meet-up organised by ZSI hosted five presentations. To find out more, please visit our events section.

    The next Café will take place on May 4,  at 2:00-3:30 pm CET.

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    INTENSITY OF ROUTINE TASKS DRIVES GENDER PAY GAP, OUR STUDY FINDS

     

    “Gender gaps in skills, tasks, and employment outcomes”, written by Laetitia Hauret (LISER), Ludivine Martin (LISER), Piotr Lewandowski (IBS), Marta Palczyńska (IBS) and Nela Šalamon (ZSI) as part of the EU-funded research project, looks into how gender differences in job tasks impact wage and skill mismatches.

     

    The first part of the report analyses survey data from 37 countries. Figures from the OECD Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) and the World Bank’s STEP Skills Measurement Program indicate that women earn 18.2% less than men, after accounting for differences in age, education level and skills. This is partly because women perform more routine tasks: more of them work in routine-intensive occupations, and in all occupations they do more repetitive tasks than men. Additionally, the difference in wages between routine and non-routine professions is wider for women than for men.

     

    “Respondents described their tasks at work, and based on their judgment we classify occupations as routine-intensive,” says Marta Palczyńska. “Those jobs are paid less, and a majority of the people who do them are women. This is one reason women’s average earnings are lower than men’s.”

     

    Even when employed in jobs that involve more complex tasks, such as creative problem solving and decision-making, women still tend to do more routine tasks than men. However, in this case the associated pay penalties are, on average, similar to those experienced by men.

     

    The report also finds that in countries with tighter laws on gender equality and more egalitarian social norms, the influence of tasks performed on the gender wage gap tends to be smaller. In countries with laws supporting equality in parenting, the segmentation of men and women into more and less routine-intensive occupations might be less pronounced.

     

    “When household and child care duties are equally shared with men, women can take up more responsibilities at work, and instead of performing only simple tasks can move to more analytical ones, which has positive effects on their salaries,” Piotr Lewandowski said.

     

    In addition to social norms and labour laws, policies that promote re-skilling and up-skilling are equally important in reducing the earnings inequality that results from the difference in the type of tasks performed. With the acceleration of digitalisation, many workers are in positions where their skills do not match the requirements of their jobs. In the European Union, 45% of workers feel they do not have the right skills.

     

    Perception of under-skilling on the rise

    The second part of the report, focusing on skill mismatch, analyses survey data from 23 European countries. It finds that between 2005 and 2015, self-perception of being under-skilled increased. The change was particularly pronounced for men in Nordic countries, where in 2005 10% of men described themselves as under-skilled, while in 2015 15% described themselves this way. For women, the change was particularly pronounced in Western countries (14% in 2005 versus 18% in 2018). Women performing non-routine interpersonal tasks are particularly likely to believe they lack skills.

     

    “The expansion of non-routine cognitive tasks, both analytical and interpersonal, induced by digitalisation can partially explain these changes,” Ludivine Martin says.

     

    “Many women switched from routine-intensive jobs to analytical and interpersonal positions,” Laetitia Hauret adds. “That sudden change caused a rise in the number of workers who perceived themselves as underskilled.”

     

    Hauret, L., Martin, L., Lewandowski, P., Palczyńska, M., Šalamon, N. (2023). Gender gaps in skills, tasks, and employment outcomes (Deliverable 5.3). Leuven: UNTANGLED project 1001004776 – H2020.

     

    The paper is avaliable here.

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    UNTANGLED TO HOLD OPEN VIRTUAL EXPERT CAFÉ ON 14 FEBRUARY

    To find out more please check our event section.

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    UNTANGLED WORKSHOP FACILITATED EXCHANGE OF IDEAS ON INEQUALITIES

     

    The workshop “Old and new inequalities in disruptive times” was organised by UNTANGLED researchers Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, and Elisa Panzera from Politecnico di Milano, with the aim of bringing together the newest research from projects: PILLARS, ESSPIN, TWIN SEEDS, and UNTANGLED. 

     

    The event brought together around 40 participants for lively discussions.

    To find out more click here.

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    UNTANGLED TO HOLD WORKSHOP ON INEQUALITIES 1 FEBRUARY

    The event, organised by UNTANGLED partner Politecnico di Milano, will feature a keynote from Professor George Petrakos of the University of Thessaly, “Geographies of inequality in Europe: Drivers, implications and policy dilemmas”, and papers from the projects UNTANGLED, Pillars, ESSPIN and TWIN SEEDS.

    To find out more click here.

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    POMPEI PAPER PUBLISHED IN INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION JOURNAL

     

    Fabrizio Pompei, Mirella Damiani and Alfred Kleinknecht’s paper, “Robots, skills and temporary jobs: evidence from six European countries” shows that in a “high knowledge cumulativeness” innovation regime, robot adoption reduces the probability of high-skilled workers being offered temporary job contracts. At the same time, automatisation did not significantly impact the situation of low- and medium-skilled workers.

     

    The situation is different in “low-cumulativeness” regimes, where companies primarily use externally acquired knowledge in their innovation process. This makes workers more easily interchangeable, and robot adoption increases the probability of temporary contracts for both medium- and high-skilled workers, but leaves low-skilled workers unaffected.

     

    These findings contribute to understanding the increasing share in Europe of temporary workers with tertiary education working as technicians and professionals, as observed by Eurofound.

     

    Mirella Damiani, Fabrizio Pompei & Alfred Kleinknecht (2022): “Robots, skills and temporary jobs: evidence from six European countries”, Industry and Innovation.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2156851

     

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    UNTANGLED RESEARCHERS AT JOBS4DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE

     

    The event in Cape Town on 14-15 December featured presentations of more than 60 papers; keynotes by Oriana Bandiera of the LSE and Ragui Assaad of the University of Minnesota and a policy panel devoted to youth unemployment in Africa.

     

    Two Untangled researchers presented their research during the forum. Piotr Lewandowski discussed his work with Katarzyna Lipowska and Mateusz Smoter on the work from home model. The authors found that employers’ and employees’ attitudes toward work from home differ in terms of salary expectations and perceived productivity changes.

     

    Zuzanna Kowalik (IBS) presented a paper written jointly with Piotr Lewandowski and Paweł Kaczmarczyk on the differences in job quality and working conditions between native and migrant platform workers in Poland.

     

     

    Categories
    Uncategorized

    UNTANGLED RESEARCHERS’ FINDINGS PUBLISHED AS A BOOK CHAPTER

     

    In the chapter, “Digitalization, Job Quality, and Subjective Well-being”, Martin and Hauret examine six facets of job quality studied in the literature: labour income; safety at work; working time and work-life balance; job security; skills development and training; employment-related relationships; and work motivation.

     

    The authors also review the literature on the impacts of digitalisation on subjective well-being, captured by employees’ self-reported feelings at work, such as job satisfaction, occupational stress and life satisfaction. Martin and Hauret highlight the key findings in the literature and identify relevant knowledge.

     

    Martin and Hauret find that there is substantial literature on the links between digitalisation and job quality in terms of labour income and work-life balance. However, studies on the link between digitalisation and safety at work, job security, skills development, relationships at work, work motivation and self-reported feelings remain scarce, and this calls for further empirical research. Regardless of the outcome variable, studies report mixed results. Differences in how digitalization and outcome variables are measured and conceptualised, as well as the national and time context and employees’ characteristics, may explain these divergent results and conclusions.

     

    Martin, L., Hauret, L. (2022). “Digitalization, Job Quality, and Subjective Well-being”. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_388-1.

     

     

    2021 © UNTANGLED. All rights reserved.
    This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101004776

    Follow us on social media